Re: Iperf Performance


On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Sahadevan, Samson joseph dev wrote:

> When I run Iperf with an I/O buffer size of about 64 bytes (-l 64) and 1
> TCP stream, the CPU remains almost idle (99%-100%) and I get a BW of
> about 90Mbytes/sec (1GB link).

> Is there a way to use the CPU more efficient thereby driving more
> throughput?

The CPU being idle likely means the bottleneck is elsewhere. For
instance you may have a switch or a NIC which has reached its maximum
packet/seconds rate. In this case the CPU can not help.

You can easily verify if the bottleneck (whatever it is) is
packets/second limited by slowly increasing the packet size and
observing the maximum packets/second you get along the way.

Packets/second bottlenecks are typically found in hardware IMHO.

Keep us posted.





Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index