RE: Question about iperf -B option


Thanks a lot. I patched the kernel and it works now.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger --at-- linux-foundation.org] 
Sent: miércoles, 30 de enero de 2008 4:17
To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Cc: david.ruiz --at-- gigle.biz
Subject: Re: Question about iperf -B option

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:16:59 +0100 (CET)
"David Ruiz" <david.ruiz --at-- gigle.biz> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to do some performance testing with two external powerline
> adaptors. For this, I have a single PC with Linux, and two ethernet cards,
> each one connected to each of the adaptors. My objective is to send data
> generated with iperf through eth1, so that it goes to the adaptor 1 and
> via powerline arrives to adaptor 2 and then to eth2.
> 
> In order to do this i configure the server as :
> iperf -s -u -B 10.10.1.2 (10.10.1.2 is the IP of eth2)
> 
> and the client as :
> iperf -c 10.10.1.2 -u -B 10.10.1.1 (10.10.1.1 is the IP of eth1)
> 
> As far as I can tell, the data arrives to the server, but they use the
> loopback. Does anybody know if this can be done (and how??)
> 
> Thank you
> 
> 
> 

there is a non-standard kernel patch called "send to self".
you can find it with some searching.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger --at-- vyatta.com>



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index