Re: no traffic generated

To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: no traffic generated
From: Paul Hyder <Paul.Hyder --at-- noaa.gov>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:59:50 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <20050608093003.66789.qmail@web60220.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050608093003.66789.qmail@web60220.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Fedora/1.7.8-1.3.1

Works fine between networks and subnets (even around the world).

Sounds like it might be time for tcpdump/ethereal (i.e. your favorite packet
capture utility).

In general this sounds like a device is dropping or filtering packets between
the two subnets.  The only other time I've seen this behavior is with a system
that had an implementation of THREADS that didn't work with iperf.
    Paul Hyder
    NOAA Forecast Systems Lab

Jason wrote:

hi, I try iperf from client to server across 2 routers in 1Gbps link. The client and server are in different subnet and able to ping each other.However iperf does not seem to generate traffic & when I manually stop iperf, I see only few Mbit/s on server.I am sure my commands are correct. Any clue? Is iperf sensitive to different subnet? thanks

References:
- no traffic generated
  - From: Jason

Prev by Date: no traffic generated
Next by Date: udp measurement
Previous by thread: no traffic generated
Next by thread: udp measurement

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index