Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method

To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method
From: Jim Ferguson <ferguson --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:04:12 -0500
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_182909234==.ALT"
In-reply-to: <4672A7AD.3000402@internet2.edu>
References: <4bb1b4060706141840q4a5ce963qb6249a4d67166169@mail.gmail.com> <4672A7AD.3000402@internet2.edu>
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net

I'll second Jeff. Thrulay is a better choice for many research-y type observations.

-Jim

At 09:52 AM 6/15/2007, Jeff W. Boote wrote:

Tiago Junqueira wrote:

Hi,
I would like to measure the latency for a specific
throughput/datarate.

You might consider using thrulay for your experiment. It keeps track of the RTT's of the actual data packets of the throughput stream from the application perspective.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/thrulay/

jeff

References:
- Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method
  - From: Tiago Junqueira
- Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method
  - From: Jeff W. Boote

Prev by Date: Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method
Next by Date: *****SPAM***** [SPAM] Unsubscripe
Previous by thread: Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method
Next by thread: Re: Measure the latency for a specific throughput/datarate method

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index