DAST: Iperf - robertdixon --at-- avaya.com

To: Iperf Users <iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net>
Subject: DAST: Iperf - robertdixon --at-- avaya.com
From: Mitch Kutzko <mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:00:36 -0600
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net

>Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:08:17 -0600
>To: robertdixon --at-- avaya.com
>Subject: DAST: Iperf - robertdixon --at-- avaya.com
>
>
>Contacting DAST re: Request for information about Iperf
>From: Robert Dixon <robertdixon --at-- avaya.com>
>
>Question/Comment:
>Good morning.
>
>I am using iperf to look at packet loss in a client's WAN. The service
provider wanted to know at what point does iperf consider a packet lost? If
the packet is received 500ms after it is sent, does it still record that
packet as valid with 500ms delay, or does it consider that packet lost?
>
>Thanks,
>-Bob
>
>
>
--
Mitch Kutzko | mitch --at-- dast.nlanr.net | mitch --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu | 217-333-1199
http://hobbes.ncsa.uiuc.edu/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DAST: Iperf - robertdixon --at-- avaya.com
  - From: Jesse Butler

Prev by Date: Re: TCP and UDP window size?
Next by Date: DAST: Other - max --at-- lunarlogic.com
Previous by thread: Iperf 2.0.1 - multicast problem
Next by thread: Re: DAST: Iperf - robertdixon --at-- avaya.com

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index