Re: DCCP with iperf was Re: Question on iperf versions
Ian, just to clarify, is it the current iperf that doesn't work with
development kernels, or your patched version ?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Ian McDonald wrote:
> On 3/7/06, John S. Estabrook <jestabro --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Connie, 2.0.2 is the recommended version, which addresses several bugs in
> > 2.0.1; the patch for 2.0.2, if you're refering to the one mentionied at
> > the bottom of the iperf page, was submitted but is not necessary---it's a
> > feature addition (re DCCP), not a bug fix.
> >
> I wondered who had also written an iperf patch for DCCP besides me and
> I see that my code has been posted up there :-)
>
> Just a note for those looking in future - the iperf works for Linux
> 2.6.14 but not on the latest development kernels. I will work on
> fixing this at some point but if anybody feels brave I think it is
> because of the introduction of service codes. It is also worth adding
> multiple CCID support as well I believe...
>
> I also intend to start merging some of the changes into the iperf
> codebase over time (probably a long time with my current workload!).
> Also this code was originally written by others and I've just tidied
> it up a little bit.
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian McDonald
> Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4
> Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com
> WAND Network Research Group
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Waikato
> New Zealand
>
--
John S. Estabrook
jestabro --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu
jestabro --at-- dast.nlanr.net