Re: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result

To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
From: "Ian McDonald" <imcdnzl --at-- gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:49:21 +1200
Content-disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=da+accHiG89OFLW2l0dAA+l2yMb9NHvjeqg7DM717SOHBMRqdDb5PQ/kC23scGWTyPr95Z5wuvkb6xDUyjJ5VIohMIzTM75yJYKUsvf+dJs/ihn+G6/TW1q7hnpq4uH+WqV1PM3FmZCYsWFLfKGrdE+CXm7tgWvgpoBmKCK+sCc=
In-reply-to: <F26421BAB0F1D146BABD4977D6159084012CA18E@ctiexch.ctinet.com>
References: <F26421BAB0F1D146BABD4977D6159084012CA18E@ctiexch.ctinet.com>
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net


Any comments on this issue will be appreciated.

Often with TCP one stream cannot use all the bandwidth available
particularly if there is loss - which is more likely with wireless.
What TCP variant are you using as some cope with loss better than
others?

Our research group has a TCP calculator available here you might be
interested in:
http://wand.net.nz/~perry/max_download.php

Ian
--
Ian McDonald
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4
Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com
WAND Network Research Group
Department of Computer Science
University of Waikato
New Zealand

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
  - From: Jin Fan

References:
- Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
  - From: Jin Fan

Prev by Date: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
Next by Date: RE: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
Previous by thread: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result
Next by thread: RE: Iperf TCP throughput measurement result

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index