Re: *****SPAM***** Questions about Iperf v 2.0.x
I´ve got the following message after sending a question to iperf-users
list. Apparently, It was identified as spam. How can I confirm the validity
of the message?
garnier --at-- embratel.com.br@dast.nlanr.net em 06-11-2006 14:17:03
Favor responder a iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Enviado Por: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Para: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
cc:
Assunto: *****SPAM***** Questions about Iperf v 2.0.x
Spam detection software, running on the system "rimantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
postmaster --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu for details.
Content preview: Hello all. I´m new to Iperf, and I noticed that its
official website doesn´t say much about Iperf v 2.0.x. Is it stable
already? Which are the differences between Iperf 1.7.x and 2.0.x? May I
already use it, or is it safer to use version 1.7.x? [...]
Content analysis details: (5.6 points, 4.9 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
[score: 0.9074]
2.6 DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN RBL: Envelope sender in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Envelope-From: garnier --at-- embratel.com.br
X-Envelope-To: <iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net>
Received: from amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu (amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu
[141.142.2.201]) by pop.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id
kA6G8Vb05548 for <iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006
10:08:31 -0600
Received: from mail1.embratel.com.br (mail1.embratel.com.br
[200.255.122.202]) by amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with
ESMTP id kA6G8Usi007619 for <iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006
10:08:31 -0600
Sensitivity:
Subject: Questions about Iperf v 2.0.x
To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
From: garnier --at-- embratel.com.br
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:17:03 -0300
Message-ID: <OF856C5B5A.5B79E6BC-ON0325721E.005917F5 --at-- embratel.com.br>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ntrjo008/Embratel(Release 5.0.13a
|April 8, 2004) at 11/06/2006 02:11:59 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-NCSA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact help --at-- ncsa.uiuc.edu for more
information, amantadine.ncsa.uiuc.edu
X-NCSA-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by pop.ncsa.uiuc.edu id
kA6G8Vb05549
X-Procmailrc: procmailrc.spam
X-MD5SUM: b5400a16a31662779fc075ee2ae518d0
Hello all. I´m new to Iperf, and I noticed that its official website
doesn´t say much about Iperf v 2.0.x. Is it stable already? Which are the
differences between Iperf 1.7.x and 2.0.x? May I already use it, or is it
safer to use version 1.7.x?
I´m sorry if I´m asking something that has already been answered before,
but there isn´t a search mecanism for the mailing list archives (not that I
know), and I didn´t find any related topics.