Re: A couple of newbe questions.

To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: A couple of newbe questions.
From: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert --at-- free.fr>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 00:33:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-reply-to: <4346D051.1070300@Iplink.net>
References: <4346D051.1070300@Iplink.net>
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Alvin Starr wrote:

>
> I just picked up iperf to try and simulate the traffic generated by VOIP
> udp packets.
>
> Under Linux I have found a couple of issues.
> 1) the delay loop chews up huge anounts of system cycles and replacing
> it with usleep makes things run MUCH better.

I think I remember hearing here that usleep() is far from being
portable.

-- 
So einfach wie möglich. Aber nicht einfacher -- Albert Einstein

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A couple of newbe questions.
  - From: Alvin Starr

References:
- A couple of newbe questions.
  - From: Alvin Starr

Prev by Date: A couple of newbe questions.
Next by Date: DAST: Iperf - errors during make process - jhunt --at-- glasshouse.com
Previous by thread: A couple of newbe questions.
Next by thread: Re: A couple of newbe questions.

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index