Re: willing to share results?
I have similar questions. I tried iperf (udp) in a
peer-to-peer 802.11g network, when I use a much longer
udp packet size (32k) I can get higher throughput than
using shorter udp packet size (1400bytes). I am kind
of confused. If the IP MTU is 1500 bytes, 1400 bytes
of udp packet size should be optimum to achieve the
highest MAC throughput. But the lab test shows the
contrary.
Anyway has any idea?
Thanks
--- "Najaf A. Shah" <najafali --at-- gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> has anyone here tested iperf 'out in the field'
> using different
> packet sizes and other parameters? If so, I'd
> really like to hear
> about your experience and look at your data if
> possible.
>
> I'm working on an university research project and my
> work is not for profit...
>
> Thanks
>
> Najaf
>
>
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs