Re: willing to share results?

To: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: willing to share results?
From: Ladan Gharai <ladan --at-- ISI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0400
Cc: Colin Perkins <csp --at-- csperkins.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
In-reply-to: <e18ef8130510121924v61b9d724ma331da7a2d3aeea8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e18ef8130510121924v61b9d724ma331da7a2d3aeea8@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net
Sender: owner-iperf-users --at-- dast.nlanr.net

Hello Najaf:

Please see:

http://www.east.isi.edu/~ladan/publications/2004icccn.pdf

we conducted an extensive number of network bandwidth measurements with Iperf, at different data rates with packet sizes of 500, 1500 and 4500 bytes, measuring out of order and lost packets.

Ladan

On Oct 12, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Najaf A. Shah wrote:

Hi,
   has anyone here tested iperf 'out in the field' using different
packet sizes and other parameters?  If so, I'd really like to hear
about your experience and look at your data if possible.

I'm working on an university research project and my work is not for profit...

Thanks

Najaf

References:
- willing to share results?
  - From: Najaf A. Shah

Prev by Date: Re: willing to share results?
Next by Date: Re: willing to share results?
Previous by thread: Re: willing to share results?
Next by thread: RE: willing to share results?

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index