| Hey Andy, Thank you!!! Everything worked as expected (i.e., ./configure, make, and sudo make install) except that with version 2.0.2 I'm getting WAY slower throughput speeds when testing on the same machine (i.e., -s 127.0.0.1): Server output: stec70:~ sandberg$ /usr/local/bin/iperf.old -s ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 127.0.0.1 port 5001 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 53897 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.55 GBytes 2.19 Gbits/sec stec70:~ sandberg$ /usr/local/bin/iperf -s ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 127.0.0.1 port 5001 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 53898 [ 4] 0.0-10.7 sec 117 MBytes 91.1 Mbits/sec Client output: stec70:~ sandberg$ /usr/local/bin/iperf.old -c 127.0.0.1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 127.0.0.1, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 79.7 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 127.0.0.1 port 53897 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.55 GBytes 2.19 Gbits/sec stec70:~ sandberg$ /usr/local/bin/iperf -c 127.0.0.1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 127.0.0.1, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 79.7 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 127.0.0.1 port 53898 connected with 127.0.0.1 port 5001 [ 3] 0.0-10.2 sec 117 MBytes 95.5 Mbits/sec I'm seeing a pretty consistent 2.19 Gbits/sec when using iperf 1.7.0 (i.e., iperf.old) and 91.1 Mbits/sec when using iperf 2.0.2 (i.e., iperf) on my 12" PowerBook --at-- 1.33GHz w/512MB RAM, running Mac OS 10.4.2. Is there something else I need to do? Or is this some kind of feature? Any help with this will be greatly appreciated, Randy On Sep 9, 2005, at 12:28 PM, McConnell Andrew (CDI) wrote:
|